Preview

Draft for review — figures are sourced but not yet signed off.

Ticketmètre

Catalogue

Violations

The catalogue splits in two, because the two provinces publish their amounts in different kinds of document. The tables themselves live one page down — this page is the way in, and what you need to know before you open either of them.

Draft for review. Every figure on this page is transcribed from the instrument cited beside it; the reviewer of record has not signed the values off. Check the cited provision before relying on an amount.

Catalogue

Two tables, one per province

Findings

What the law does NOT say

ONTARIOFINDING

There is no Schedule C

The lettered sub-schedules of the consolidation run A, B, D, E and F. The letter C is skipped on the face of the document. That is a fact about how the schedule is lettered — not something missing from this site, and nothing here is waiting to fill it in.

A · B · D · E · F

Catalogue

How to read these tables

Two provinces, two tables, and they are not the same kind of document. Ontario's amounts are set fines from a consolidation published by the Office of the Chief Justice; Québec's are ranges stated inside the article of the Code de la sécurité routière that creates the offence. One is administrative, the other statutory, and the difference shows up in every row.

The Ontario table is keyed by the item number an offence notice prints, alongside the provision. The Québec table is keyed by the article that STATES the amount — frequently not the article that creates the offence you were charged under.

Every figure in both is read out of this site's payload. Nothing is typed by hand, and where an instrument states no amount the table says so in words rather than printing a blank, a dash or a zero.

How it works

Which table answers your question

If you are holding an Ontario offence notice, start from the item number printed on it. That number is the schedule's own key, it is more reliable than the offence description beside it, and it is what tells you which row you are actually in.

If you are holding a Québec constat, start from the CSR article printed on it, then find the article that PRICES it — for a great many offences that is a single omnibus provision rather than the article you were charged under.

If your question is about speeding in either province, neither table is the right tool: speeding is priced by a rate ladder in Ontario and by a formula in Québec, and both are worked through in the calculator on the speeding page.

  • Ontario: an amount here is a SET FINE — what settles the matter out of court. It is not the maximum a court could impose, and for some offences no set fine exists at all.
  • Québec: an amount here is a RANGE the article states. The figure claimed on a constat sits inside it.
  • Neither table includes municipal by-law offences, parking above all: those are priced by individual municipalities and are out of scope for this site.

Scope

What this site covers

  • Covered

    Ontario and Québec only. Those are the two jurisdictions whose instruments have been read for this site, and every figure here belongs to one of them.

  • Unmeasured here

    Eleven further provinces and territories are UNMEASURED here — that means they have not been read for this site, not that they are absent from Canada’s fine landscape. Nothing on this site is a national claim.

  • Out of scope

    Municipal by-law offences — parking above all — are priced by roughly four hundred municipalities and are out of scope. This site prices provincial offences.

Next step

Start with the number on your own notice

Then read the instrument beside it, and decide what to do next.

Preview — Draft for review — figures are sourced but not yet signed off.