Questions

It tells you what the instruments state for the offence you describe, per province, with the provision cited beside each figure. It is not the court office and it cannot see your notice.

Because the schedule states an absence there rather than an amount, in every zone. It is the single most-asked question in this market and it has no dollar answer out of court: the offence is answered in court, under the statutory fine, which is a different instrument and a different ladder — and that ladder does price the band.

The schedule prints the short form and never expands it. One place in the same document spells out “No Set Fine” in the same role, and that analogue is the whole of the evidence — so this site states the expansion as a supported reading and labels it an inference wherever it uses it. What the row means in practice is not in doubt: there is no amount that settles the offence out of court.

Because Ontario and Québec price traffic offences with different instruments, different demerit-point systems and different clocks. A number that does not say which province it belongs to is wrong in one of them.

Yes, and in both provinces it is the commonest speeding case there is. Each province’s fine ladder starts lower than its points ladder, so between the two first boundaries there is a real fine, a real conviction and nothing on the points side of the record. The two ladders come from different instruments and they do not share their first boundary.

This site does not answer that, and the reason is on the page: the camera provision limits what such a conviction can carry — it rules out imprisonment and a suspension for default — and says nothing about points, while the owner-versus-driver mechanism that would decide it is not among the instruments read for this site. Asserting that camera tickets never carry points would go past the text, and asserting that they do would go further.

From a consolidated set fine schedule published by the Office of the Chief Justice, which the schedule itself describes as prepared for convenience of reference only — not from the statute. Where a court fine is meant instead, this site says so and cites the Act.

From the Code de la sécurité routière itself, which states either a formula or a range in the article that creates the offence, plus the frais and contribution their own instruments state.

No. This site has no licence-number, notice-reference or date-of-birth field anywhere and nothing here looks up a driver record. Both provinces run their own lookup services; this site links out and never mimics one.

The instruments read for this site do not settle it, so both readings are stated. On an uncontested plea the amount claimed on the document is very likely what is paid — that is what the claim is for. For a contested range offence, the article states a minimum and a maximum and the claimed figure is the prosecution’s claim rather than a ceiling, so the outcome can land anywhere inside the statutory range.